A brief introduction to argument mapping

Welcome to the wonderful world of argument maps! An argument map is a visual depiction of an argument, which is a line of reasoning in favor of a conclusion. Each “premise”— each separate claim— in the argument is represented in the map as a “claim bubble.” The map as a whole shows how the premises combine together to support the conclusion. Here’s a sample argument map showing how two claims can work together to support the conclusion:

placeholder image


The conclusion is at the top of the map, with the premises under it, reinforcing in a visual way the idea that the premises help support the conclusion.


Premises working together to support a conclusion

The green arrow shows that the premises support / are "in favor of” the conclusion. Notice that the claims are working together to support the conclusion. Knowing that there are no clouds in the sky is not enough on its own to know that it won’t rain soon— we also have to know that clouds are needed for rain to occur.

ArguMap makes it easy to group and ungroup claims.  For more info about ArguMaps’ claim grouping features, see this description of ArguMap’s unique features.


Premises working separately to support a conclusion

In addition to working together in support of a conclusion, premises can sometimes work separately in support of a conclusion.  Here’s an example of such an argument:

placeholder image


Unlike in the previous argument, neither claim requires the other to support the conclusion.


Differences in premises’ strength of support for a conclusion

While various premises can provide reasons in favor of a conclusion, those premises may differ in the strength of the reasons they provide in favor of the conclusion.  Argument maps can depict that difference in strength with thicker connectors signifying stronger reasons and thinner connectors signifying weaker reasons, as can be seen in the following map:

placeholder image


What a meterologist says is a stronger reason for the conclusion than what a non-meteorologist friend of ours says.

ArguMap makes it easy to depict the relative strength of premises in support of a conclusion. For more info about ArguMaps’ ability to show stronger or weaker reasons, see this description of ArguMap’s unique features.


Claims challenging other claims

Sometimes claims can offer a challenge— an objection— to one or more of the premises of an argument.  Here’s an extension of the argument map above that depicts such an objection.

placeholder image


Notice how we can use a different type of connector— different in color (red) and solidity (dashed)— to depict an objection about what Mary said.

ArguMap makes it easy to create both supporting and challenging connectors. For more info about ArguMaps’ custom connector-creating functionality, see this description of ArguMap’s unique features.


Claims challenging connections in the argument

Not only can someone challenge a particular premise in an argument, but they can challenge the connection between premises and the argument’s conclusion.  These kinds of objection don’t call into question the premises themselves.  Instead, they question whether the premises provide adequate support for the conclusion.  Here’s a map depicting this kind of “undercutting” objection:

placeholder image


The objection here doesn’t call into question what the barometer says.  Instead, it throws doubt on the barometer’s reading providing any good indication of what the weather soon will be.



Congrats!  You’ve just learned the basics of argument map-making!

With the concepts and skills you’ve just learned, you can create visualizations of lines of reasoning that will help you wrap your mind more effectively around those arguments.  The arguments and maps described above are pretty simple ones, but the concepts described there can be used to craft much more complicated arguments, too.

Be sure to check out the User Guide for ArguMap to learn more about how to use ArguMap to create argument maps.  Happy mapping!

Pricing

ArguMap will be free to download and can be used forever to open and view maps in read-only format. A free 30-day trial of the app's "Pro" features allows users to try out the powerful editing functionality of the app. A one-time in-app purchase of $8.99 unlocks those Pro editing features for use beyond the trial period.

The editing features of ArguMap are also available in ArguMap's paid-up-front version— ArguMap Pro— which will be available for the same price, $8.99. ArguMap Pro is ideal for institutional purchases and for families seeking to share the app via Family Sharing.

Availability

ArguMap and ArguMap Pro will be available in the App Store, for any iOS device running iOS 14 or greater, in all territories the App Store supports, on Wednesday, November 25, 2020. Until that time, you can try out the open public beta here.

About Me

My name is Chad Mohler, and I’m the creator, developer, and designer of ArguMap. I’ve had a love of technology and All Things Apple ever since I started programming simple educational games way back in fifth grade, on one of my school’s two(!) Apple ][ computers. I am now a Professor of Philosophy at Truman State University, Missouri’s premier public liberal arts institution, where I bring my passion for technology to the classroom. I do my best to use it effectively to guide my students to a better understanding of important philosophical concepts and theories. ArguMap was borne out of my interest in helping my students develop in their ability to offer insightful philosophical arguments of their own. Partly in recognition of my efforts, I was selected in 2019 as an Apple Distinguished Educator.

Questions?

I am very happy to answer any additional questions you have and to supply you with any additional information that you need. You can reach me at appsolutelyfun@gmail.com.

For more info, feel free to contact us:
appsolutelyfun@gmail.com.

Apple, the Apple logo, iPod, iCloud, and iTunes are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. iPhone is a trademark of Apple Inc.